On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > On 03-Jul-2003 Nate Lawson wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > >> I personally think that all tunable should be read-only (or rw if > >> possible) sysctls... > > > > I'm still not sure why we have both mechanisms. Perhaps a useful approach > > would be to sweep the tree for tunables and change them to sysctls with > > appropriate permissions (read-only if in doubt). Then remove the tunable > > mechanism. Care to put together a patch? > > Cause you can't set sysctl's from the loader, only tunables? Are you > going to duplicate the entire kernel environment from 'kenv' in > sysctl? Ah, I thought the two had been merged such that you could do that. -NateReceived on Thu Jul 03 2003 - 08:36:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:13 UTC