Nate Lawson wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > >>On 03-Jul-2003 Nate Lawson wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: >>> >>>>I personally think that all tunable should be read-only (or rw if >>>>possible) sysctls... >>> >>>I'm still not sure why we have both mechanisms. Perhaps a useful approach >>>would be to sweep the tree for tunables and change them to sysctls with >>>appropriate permissions (read-only if in doubt). Then remove the tunable >>>mechanism. Care to put together a patch? >> >>Cause you can't set sysctl's from the loader, only tunables? Are you >>going to duplicate the entire kernel environment from 'kenv' in >>sysctl? > > > Ah, I thought the two had been merged such that you could do that. You can set sysctls from loder.conf. I just checked it to be shure. regards, floReceived on Thu Jul 03 2003 - 08:45:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:13 UTC