Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 14:27:42 -0700 (PDT) > Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org> wrote: > > >>p.s. this does not mean that I do not appreciate the work you are >>doing to keep our compiler up to date.. Keep up the good work. >> > > > Julian, > > there was nothing in your question that could possibly offend me. I do > not take comments about GCC suckage personally. Yes, GCC 3.3 compilation > speed is likely to suffer a bit compared to 3.2, although the change > should be pretty minimal. There are examples where GCC 3.3 even beats > 3.2 in compilation speed, but I would not keep much hope :) C is tad bit slower. C++ is generally faster. Compared with the speed of other compilers GCC is still simply ridiculous. > The GCC folks have started to take compilation speed seriously in 3.4 > branch, we'll see if changed attitude will make a difference in their > next major release. > > For now I am pretty happy that a newer compiler did not overflow boot2 > block. This is nice compared with a stable trend demonstrated by _all_ > previous releases.Received on Wed Jul 09 2003 - 12:57:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:14 UTC