On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:34:01PM +1000, John Birrell wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:24:42AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > I'm regularly upgrading 4.0-RELEASE to 5.x-CURRENT to check that > > the upgrade path wasn't broken, and this check comes very handy. > > I wouldn't object though if it was done using kern.osreldate. > > > > I'd happily test any patches in this direction for you, John. > > Thanks. Since Peter made the change, I'd like to wait for him to comment > on the code I sent him that would avoid the core dump. I think that running > sh as a final check is valid, but I'd like to see a 'probable' case checked > first and an message printed accordingly before making the core dump as a > last resort (in favour of shooting the whole foot off - one toe is better > than the whole foot!). > Sure, that would be a much better (and safer) approach. Could you please send me your code as well, I'm interested in revieweing it. P.S. Nice to see you're still in the FreeBSD business. :-) Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru_at_sunbay.com Sunbay Software Ltd, ru_at_FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:17 UTC