Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:56:15 -0500, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7_at_cox.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:56:50 +0200, Michael Nottebrock 
> <michaelnottebrock_at_gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 05 June 2003 20:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>>
>>> I own the same chipest here, which it is support in 4.x and no longer 
>>> in
>>> 5.x.. :-( Note that, I only check in the 5.x's NOTES
>>
>> You didn't check in the right NOTES then. 5-CURRENT has different NOTES 
>> files, one general, machine independent and several smaller others for 
>> each platform. The machine independent is in /usr/src/sys/conf, the 
>> others are in /usr/src/sys/<ARCH>/conf.
>
> Do'h! You are right that I didn't check in /usr/src/sys/conf/.. It does 
> exist and I am doing the rebuild kernel right now.. Thanks..

Here's the result:
================================
# dmesg | grep via
viapropm0: SMBus I/O base at 0x5000
viapropm0: <VIA VT82C686A Power Management Unit> port 0x5000-0x500f at 
device 7.4 on pci0
viapropm0: failed to enable port mapping!
viapropm0: could not allocate bus space
device_probe_and_attach: viapropm0 attach returned 6
================================

================================
none0_at_pci0:7:4: class=0x0c0500 card=0x30571106 chip=0x30571106 rev=0x40 
hdr=0x00
    vendor   = 'VIA Technologies Inc'
    device   = 'VT82C686A/B ACPI Power Management Controller'
    class    = serial bus
    subclass = SMBus
================================

I don't know what the errors mean..

Cheers,
Mezz

> It's only thing that I dislike about 5.x is example configure files move 
> to the different places (ie: NOTES, make.conf and etc).. I will get use 
> to them, thought..
>
> Cheers,
> Mezz
>
>



-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.