On Saturday, June 28, 2003, at 3:18PM, David Schultz wrote: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2003, David Leimbach wrote: >> Because we aren't working on anything and need something to do... so >> we >> find >> ways to think about how we can enforce quality without understanding >> how stuff >> works first maybe? > > Umm...no, but thanks for the insult. How about: Because we are > working at 3 AM to figure out why signals aren't getting delivered > to java properly and we see an email saying that things will be > more broken ``for a while'' and misinterpret what ``for a while'' > means in this context. See previous post. > Well I apologize... it seemed we had yet another person ready to jump on someone for bothering to commit an important piece of code. My email was caught in a state where it was neither sent nor delivered but I replied to your original mail hours ago... I even think I cancelled the one that offended you but apparently not early enough. I apologize again for the insult... I just thought you were being somewhat harsh on someone who may have had a minor english language barrier. DaveReceived on Sat Jun 28 2003 - 13:17:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:13 UTC