Thus spake Alexander Langer <alex_at_big.endian.de>: > I had several panics related to background fsck now. Once I disabled > background fsck, all went ok. > > It began when I pressed the reset buttons on several boots while the > system was still doing fscks. [...] > Mar 24 21:48:59 fump kernel: panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir You would have gotten this one without bgfsck as well the next time you tried to look the offending directory. Background fsck only expedited the panic by reading all the directories on the system in order to perform its checks. Basically, the panic is the kernel's way of telling you that something is unexpectedly wrong with the filesystem (due in this case to ATA write caching), and that it is going to give up rather than risk causing further damage. UFS, as well as most other filesystems, are not designed to tolerate failures on the part of the hardware to honor its guarantees, so it's hard to do better without inventing a new filesystem.Received on Sun Mar 30 2003 - 07:59:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC