On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 04:13:07AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > This is just an announcement that I'm going to add bzip2(1) > support to man(1) and makewhatis(1) (catman(1) already has > it), and then switch the default compression method from > gzip(1) to bzip2(1), for manpages, Groff and Texinfo docs. > (The latest 4.5 texinfo supports bzip2.) I don't mean to sound rude, but what is the justification for this? An extremely rough test: $ time bzip2 -c sh.1 | wc -c 16099 0.24s real 0.21s user 0.03s system $ time gzip -c sh.1 | wc -c 18036 0.12s real 0.10s user 0.01s system bzip2 takes ~2 times as long as gzip and the resulting file with bzip2 is ~0.9 times the size of the gzip file. bzip2 does not seem to perform significantly better on small files: $ time gzip -c who.1 | wc -c 2168 0.03s real 0.00s user 0.00s system $ time bzip2 -c who.1 | wc -c 2208 0.04s real 0.03s user 0.00s system (These tests weren't conducted on a particularly fast machine by today's standards: CPU: Pentium/P55C (199.43-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x544 Stepping = 4 Features=0x8001bf<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8,MMX> ) TimReceived on Thu May 01 2003 - 20:33:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:05 UTC