On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 08:19:23PM +0200, Thomas Seck wrote: > > The "sole benefit" you see is clearly enough of a benefit. There _are_ > > good reasons to reduce dependency on GPL, y'know. > > Sorry, but then you would have to replace binutils, gcc, groff, and many > other things too. But this has been discussed to death already. They are used to *build* the system. Not use it. One could remove all the manpage sources and only have the catman bits .bzip2'ed. -- -- David (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org)Received on Fri May 02 2003 - 12:30:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:06 UTC