Ian Dowse wrote: > > In message <3EB2FB35.8060104_at_btc.adaptec.com>, Scott Long writes: > >Kirk and all, > > > >Recently a panic started appearing on mine and other's systems while > >under load. I have an SMP system with all UFS1+softupdates > > Try reverting revisions sys/vm/vm_object.c 1.274 and kern/vfs_subr.c > revision 1.444, i.e. apply the patch below. I think there may be > cases where the `all' flag was necessary; instrumentation of > vm_object_page_remove() in a kernel from Apr 5th shows cases where > pages with both wrapped negative (indirection blocks I presume) and > larger than object->size page indices get selected, so this would > have been broken by limiting the range to < object->size. > Yes, you're right. It appears that the vm_object's size isn't properly maintained for vnode-backed objects. AlanReceived on Fri May 02 2003 - 23:20:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:06 UTC