On Wed, 7 May 2003, Mark Santcroos wrote: Mark, > > ACPI-0293: *** Warning: Buffer created with zero length in AML > > -0166: *** Error: UtAllocate: Attempt to allocate zero bytes > > Does everyone have this or only the people where hw.acpi reports bogus > values for battery life and such? Just rebuilded and I don't see this (phew :). Laptop: Toshiba Satellite Pro 4600 ON POWER: ~$ sysctl hw.acpi hw.acpi.supported_sleep_state: S1 S3 S4 S5 hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5 hw.acpi.sleep_button_state: S1 hw.acpi.lid_switch_state: NONE hw.acpi.standby_state: S1 hw.acpi.suspend_state: S3 hw.acpi.sleep_delay: 0 hw.acpi.s4bios: 1 hw.acpi.verbose: 0 hw.acpi.disable_on_poweroff: 1 hw.acpi.thermal.min_runtime: 0 hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate: 30 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 3282 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.active: -1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.thermal_flags: 0 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV: 3692 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._HOT: -1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT: 3702 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._ACx: 3692 3692 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 hw.acpi.battery.life: 100 hw.acpi.battery.time: -1 hw.acpi.battery.state: 0 hw.acpi.battery.units: 1 hw.acpi.battery.info_expire: 5 hw.acpi.acline: 1 ON BATTERY: ~$ sysctl hw.acpi hw.acpi.supported_sleep_state: S1 S3 S4 S5 hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5 hw.acpi.sleep_button_state: S1 hw.acpi.lid_switch_state: NONE hw.acpi.standby_state: S1 hw.acpi.suspend_state: S3 hw.acpi.sleep_delay: 0 hw.acpi.s4bios: 1 hw.acpi.verbose: 0 hw.acpi.disable_on_poweroff: 1 hw.acpi.thermal.min_runtime: 0 hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate: 30 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 3282 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.active: -1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.thermal_flags: 0 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV: 3692 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._HOT: -1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT: 3702 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._ACx: 3692 3692 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 hw.acpi.battery.life: 100 hw.acpi.battery.time: 129 hw.acpi.battery.state: 1 hw.acpi.battery.units: 1 hw.acpi.battery.info_expire: 5 hw.acpi.acline: 0 ~$ dmesg |grep -i acpi Terminate ACPI Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc05362e4. acpi0: <TOSHIB 750 > on motherboard acpi_bus_number: root bus has no _BBN, assuming 0 acpi0: power button is handled as a fixed feature programming model. Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0xee08-0xee0b on acpi0 acpi_cpu0: <CPU> port 0x530-0x537 on acpi0 acpi_tz0: <thermal zone> port 0x530-0x537 on acpi0 pcib0: <ACPI Host-PCI bridge> port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib0 pcib1: <ACPI PCI-PCI bridge> at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib1 pcib2: <ACPI PCI-PCI bridge> at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib2 acpi_lid0: <Control Method Lid Switch> on acpi0 acpi_cmbat0: <Control method Battery> on acpi0 acpi_acad0: <AC adapter> on acpi0 speaker0 port 0x61 on acpi0 atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 fdc0: <Enhanced floppy controller (i82077, NE72065 or clone)> port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 sio0 port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 ppc0 port 0x778-0x77a,0x378-0x37f irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 acpi_bus_number: root bus has no _BBN, assuming 0 So, until know no problems! Regards, Richard. ---- Paul Vixie in an interview with Sendmail.net: Now that the Internet has the full spectrum of humanity as users, the technology is showing its weakness: it was designed to be used by friendly, smart people. Spammers, as an example of a class, are neither friendly nor smart.Received on Tue May 06 2003 - 23:37:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:06 UTC