On Tuesday 06 May 2003 10:46 pm, W. Josephson wrote: > I wouldn't notice a difference of 10-25% given my current > usage pattern on the laptop -- we're talking a factor of three or so > in the time to build world (~6 hrs on a 900MHz PIII with 5400RPM > disk); opening a new xterm in X11 now takes a second or so. I'm in > the process of building a new kernel and am going to try locking the > CPU into high performance mode. That hasn't been necessary in the > past with either -STABLE or any version of -CURRENT, but the low clock > rate reported when the kernel boots is suspicious. The numbers you report for buildworld time are roughly on par for my 233mhz box here, on a good day. It's a kick-off-the-build, leave-for-work, come-back-after-dinner sort of box. :-) But my point is, that reported speed might not be so far off, for whatever reason. I couldn't tell from your dmesg if you're using ACPI. If not, does enabling it (on a recent -current) help? I've been running into strange situations with CPU throttling on my machines here, though a throttled CPU still reports the right speed for me.... -Cliff L. BiffleReceived on Wed May 07 2003 - 03:05:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:06 UTC