On Wed, 21 May 2003, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2003 18:10:14 -0700, David O'Brien <obrien_at_FreeBSD.ORG> > wrote: [ snip ] > > Honest question of you -- I'll assume you're subscribed to > > freebsd-current_at_. How have you missed all the warnings from myself and > > others not to trust the -march=pentium4 optimizations? I honestly want > > to know so we can figure out a better way of getting the word out. > > Perhaps, it should be add in the errata? Also, add the comments in the > make.conf. > > Cheers, > Mezz > > >> I'm not sure how CPUTYPE gets handled, but perhaps p4 should expand to - > >> march=pentium3, if possible. > > > > I feel some will screem if we take away the ability to use > > -march=pentium4 in places they know for sure will work. Unix is about > > mechanisms, not policy. Why do we set CPUTYPE by default? This has bit me before also. It seems to me that NO_CPU_CFLAGS=yes should be the default. Even -mpentiumpro caused problems for me. -- Dan EischenReceived on Wed May 21 2003 - 16:44:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:08 UTC