Re: gcc/libm floating-point bug?

David O'Brien wrote:
> Honest question of you -- I'll assume you're subscribed to
> freebsd-current_at_.  How have you missed all the warnings from myself and
> others not to trust the -march=pentium4 optimizations?  I honestly want
> to know so we can figure out a better way of getting the word out.

IMO, it's the same as overclocking: no matter how much you
warn people ablout it, they will continue to insist on
complaining to you when they shoot their foot off by acting
contrary to your good advice.

-- Terry