Nate Lawson wrote: >>Your patch works wonderfully on my Dell 8200. What are the risks of the >>patch? I'd like to put it into 5.1 if possible. > > > No, please do not add this patch. It was authored by Mark Santcroos > <marks_at_ripe.net> and is a reduction in correctness. See this message > where the correct thing to do is to add RefOf() and DerefOf() to the ASL. > > http://home.jp.freebsd.org/cgi-bin/showmail/acpi-jp/2258 > > -Nate Ok, thanks for the information. Unfortunately, the current ACPI drop has the appearance of being a bit of a regression for many people. If this implies that lots of ASL/AML out there is buggy, it still won't be very satisfying for users. What is an acceptable solution here? ScottReceived on Thu May 22 2003 - 08:23:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:08 UTC