On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 07:36, Anti wrote: > > > I feel some will screem if we take away the ability to use > > > -march=pentium4 in places they know for sure will work. Unix is about > > > mechanisms, not policy. > > > > Well, we've got a compiler here with a broken mechanism. Deciding whether or > > not to act on it sounds like a policy decision to me. I just hope 5.1 > > doesn't get shipped with such an easy way to break stuff. > > > p4 should expand to "-march=pentium4 -mno-sse2" (could set it to pentium3, but > then people would see pentium3 being used when they specified p4 and think it's > a bug)... > > any educated person with a legit reason to use -march=pentium4 without disabling > sse2 can always add it to CFLAGS instead of setting it in CPUTYPE... > > don't see why anyone wouldn't want to put an end to all the breakage and bug > reports due to this when the fix is so simple and of no real harm... As of this morning, p4 CPUTYPE will to produce -march=pentium3. Your solution may have been more correct, but this is just a workaround until the next gcc gets imported. I hope the note in bsd.cpu.mk will be enough to warn people. -- Eric Anholt eta_at_lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt_at_FreeBSD.orgReceived on Thu May 22 2003 - 08:18:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:08 UTC