John Baldwin wrote: > On 22-May-2003 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >>On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:01:27AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: >> >>>Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >>> >>>>While it may seem confusing at a glance, it's okay (skrb5). >>>>Example: we don't provide "share" distribution, but we have >>>>"sshare" source distribution. Similarly here, we don't >>>>provide "krb5" distribution any more (it's part of the >>>>"crypto" distribution), but we provide "skrb5" distribution, >>>>in the same location as "scrypto" and "ssecure", in >>>>${CHROOTDIR}/R/ftp/crypto/. >>>> >>> >>>I'd have to say that I'd rather not perpetuate the inconsistency. >>>These kinds of things make the installer more and more obscure. >>> >> >>What I'm trying to say it that source distribution are >>not strictly bound to their binary equivalents. >> >>The sshare source dist partly ends up in the manpages >>and catpages bin dists. >> >> >>>>>Also, have you tested a release with this patch? >>>>> >>>> >>>>Since it only affects sysinstall(8), I just recompiled the >>>>latter, and played with it for a bit on a running system. >>> >>>Great! John's patch looked a little more complete, maybe John >>>can comment on that. >>> >> >>May I have a look at John's patch as well? > > > It's pretty much identical actually except that I didn't touch > the manpage. Oh, and I left DIST_CRYPTO_BIN around rather than > axeing it. As long as it has been tested I'm fine with either one. > I do think we should fix the skrb5 issue. Hmm, actually, having > looked at how the src dists are built (one for each top-level dir > in /usr/src), getting rid of skrb5 would require an ugly hack, so > I guess we should leave it around. > I think that your patch also updated the DIST_CRYPTO_ALL to reflect the removed dist flags. Not a big deal though. ScottReceived on Thu May 22 2003 - 10:54:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:08 UTC