Re: FreeBSD 5.1-BETA2 install results

From: John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 12:33:09 -0400 (EDT)
On 22-May-2003 Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:01:27AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>> >
>> >While it may seem confusing at a glance, it's okay (skrb5).
>> >Example: we don't provide "share" distribution, but we have
>> >"sshare" source distribution.  Similarly here, we don't
>> >provide "krb5" distribution any more (it's part of the
>> >"crypto" distribution), but we provide "skrb5" distribution,
>> >in the same location as "scrypto" and "ssecure", in
>> >${CHROOTDIR}/R/ftp/crypto/.
>> >
>> 
>> I'd have to say that I'd rather not perpetuate the inconsistency.
>> These kinds of things make the installer more and more obscure.
>> 
> What I'm trying to say it that source distribution are
> not strictly bound to their binary equivalents.
> 
> The sshare source dist partly ends up in the manpages
> and catpages bin dists.
> 
>> >>Also, have you tested a release with this patch?
>> >>
>> >
>> >Since it only affects sysinstall(8), I just recompiled the
>> >latter, and played with it for a bit on a running system.
>> 
>> Great!  John's patch looked a little more complete, maybe John
>> can comment on that.
>> 
> May I have a look at John's patch as well?

It's pretty much identical actually except that I didn't touch
the manpage.  Oh, and I left DIST_CRYPTO_BIN around rather than
axeing it.  As long as it has been tested I'm fine with either one.
I do think we should fix the skrb5 issue.  Hmm, actually, having
looked at how the src dists are built (one for each top-level dir
in /usr/src), getting rid of skrb5 would require an ugly hack, so
I guess we should leave it around.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Received on Thu May 22 2003 - 07:33:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:08 UTC