Re: 5.1 beta2 still in trouble with pam_ldap

From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des_at_ofug.org>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 08:24:34 +0200
Ruslan Ermilov <ru_at_freebsd.org> writes:
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:45:44AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Gordon Tetlow <gordont_at_gnf.org> writes:
> > > I'm unfamiliar with ["binding"]. What's it do?
> > It behaves like "sufficient" should, i.e. failure is not ignored.
> You mean, _last_ failure is not ignored?

I don't understand the question.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des_at_ofug.org
Received on Thu May 22 2003 - 21:24:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:09 UTC