Re: 5.1 beta2 still in trouble with pam_ldap

From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 09:28:48 +0300
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 08:24:34AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov <ru_at_freebsd.org> writes:
> > On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:45:44AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > Gordon Tetlow <gordont_at_gnf.org> writes:
> > > > I'm unfamiliar with ["binding"]. What's it do?
> > > It behaves like "sufficient" should, i.e. failure is not ignored.
> > You mean, _last_ failure is not ignored?
> 
> I don't understand the question.
> 
In a chain with mutiple "binding" modules, only the _last_
failure gets ignored?  Meaning, if some other module succeeds,
override the failure status, right?


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov		Sysadmin and DBA,
ru_at_sunbay.com		Sunbay Software AG,
ru_at_FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251	Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age

Received on Thu May 22 2003 - 21:29:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:09 UTC