Re: gbde performance question

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:58:13 +0200
In message <20030523110255.A78432_at_daneel.foundation.hs>, Heiko Schaefer writes:

>loopaes seems to beat gbde's throughput by a factor from what i hear.
>assuming that gbde is not computationally more complex by that factor, it
>would be nice to be on par :)

In all likelyhood, loopaes does more or less the same thing as "cjd" in
OpenBSD, and that won't keep your data safe for 10 years in my estimate.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Fri May 23 2003 - 00:58:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:09 UTC