Re: policy on GPL'd drivers?

From: M. Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 03:14:03 -0600 (MDT)
In message: <200305281524.10145.doconnor_at_gsoft.com.au>
            "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor_at_gsoft.com.au> writes:
: You need 'FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=' in the install target.

True.

: 1) If the port is updated between builds you end up with two version of the 
: port installed.

True.  That's a weakness in the ports system, which is why we have
portupgrade.  However, I didn't want to require portupgrade for
something so 'simple'.

: 2) You can't control where the module gets put - arguably this isn't a 
: calamity, but I think it makes more sense for the modules to end up in 
: /boot/modules, or some analog to it that is in $PREFIX.

It should go in /boot/kernel, and not into $PREFIX, but that's a
philisophical problem I have with ports.  ALL modules should be in /,
imho, since you don't know if the module is required to mount /.

: I guess the problem with mandating somewhere in $PREFIX is that the loader 
: can't load it, so that's no good. I guess the only choice left is 
: /boot/modules.

/boot/kernel

: Any comments?

Well, the patch was mostly a strawman to promote discussions about the
issues.

Warner
Received on Wed May 28 2003 - 00:14:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:09 UTC