David Leimbach wrote: > I have the GPLd source to the nforce drivers for Linux > to support the nVidia nforce and nforce2 drivers in the kernel. > > To port these to FreeBSD would be an interesting task [if it hasn't > already been done] and I have been looking for an excuse to get > down and dirty with FBSD. > [Yes... talk is cheap... just do it... Nike-a-go-go etc etc... :)] > > What is the policy on drivers that are clearly going to have to be > GPLd by the viral clause since I am referencing a GPL driver to do the > porting work myself? Are these allowed in the kernel? Well, you can't have a GPL driver in the kernel. But, alas, what "in the kernel" means is a bit fuzzy. Basically, no GPL code will go in GENERIC, because GENERIC is what we distribute, and having any GPL code in it would automatically taint the rest of the kernel. Also, there's some dispute on whether something that is linkable to the kernel, like a kernel module, would taint the kernel too. LGPL is preferred because there's no such doubts in this case. But I think the general consensus is that a kernel module can't taint the kernel. This would cause trouble mostly for installation. A user, of course, is free to compile a kernel with all the GPL code he wants. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) Gerencia de Operacoes Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados Coordenacao de Seguranca VIVO Centro Oeste Norte Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904 E-mail: Daniel.Capo_at_tco.net.br Daniel.Sobral_at_tcoip.com.br dcs_at_tcoip.com.br Outros: dcs_at_newsguy.com dcs_at_freebsd.org capo_at_notorious.bsdconspiracy.net The one you want is never the one on sale.Received on Wed May 28 2003 - 05:06:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:09 UTC