On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Schnoopay wrote: > >> Are you using moused? Is this SMP or UP? What CPUs are you using? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jeff > > > > I am having similar problems after my last cvsup (10-31-03) also using a > > USB MS Intellimouse. Mouse is slow to respond under ULE but fine under > > 4BSD. The mouse feels like it's being sampled at a slow rate. > > > > I am using moused, on a UP Athlon XP 1800+. I am running seti at home at > > nice 15, but kill the seti process made no notable difference. I failed > > to check objective performance as the interactive experience was truly > > difficult to work with and I just wanted to get my work done. =] > > > > -Schnoopay > > I just disabled moused and told X to read from /dev/ums0 and the mouse > problems are gone. I haven't changed anything else from when the mouse > was "sticky" so I guess not using moused is a good work around. > I'm not able to reproduce this at all. Could any of you folks that are experiencing this problem update to sched_ule.c rev 1.75 and tell me if it persists? > -Schnoopay > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >Received on Sun Nov 02 2003 - 12:08:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:27 UTC