Re: possible NIS/ACL bug?

From: Mark Nipper <nipsy_at_tamu.edu>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 00:21:14 -0600
On 03 Nov 2003, Mark Nipper wrote:
> 	Uh oh!  It's that last part where there are the two extra
> entries for the two ACL added groups, but no GID seems to have
> been stored with each entry, whereas the example in the daemon
> news article does actually show GID's in these places.

	Of course, looking at the example right after I sent the
message, I see that the file inherited default UID's from the
directory, not GID's, but blah, I assume it should still work the
same either way?  Or maybe it's a "feature" and not a bug.  :)

-- 
Mark Nipper                                                e-contacts:
Computing and Information Services                      nipsy_at_tamu.edu
Texas A&M University                        http://ops.tamu.edu/nipsy/
College Station, TX 77843-3142     AIM/Yahoo: texasnipsy ICQ: 66971617
(979)575-3193                                      MSN: nipsy_at_tamu.edu

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GG/IT d- s++:+ a- C++$ UBL+++$ P--->+++ L+++$ E---
W++ N+ o K++ w(---) O++ M V(--) PS+++(+) PE(--) Y+
PGP++(+) t 5 X R tv b+++ DI+(++) D+ G e h r++ y+(**)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

---begin random quote of the moment---
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
----end random quote of the moment----
Received on Sun Nov 02 2003 - 21:21:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:27 UTC