On Thursday 13 November 2003 22:25, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc: > > > > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer <news_at_schmalzbauer.de> wrote: > > > >> Well, I don't have any measurements but in my case it's not > > > >> neccessary at all. I built a UP kernel with ULE like Kris advised > > > >> me. > > > > > > > > Are you running an up-to-date 5.1-CURRENT? ULE was broken with these > > > > characteristics until very recently. If you're up-to-date and still > > > > see these problems, you need to post to the current mailing list. > > > > > > > > Kris > > > > > > Yes, I am running current as of 13. Nov. > > > > > > Find attached my first problem description. > > > > This time I also attached my dmesg and kernel conf > > Try running seti with nice +20 rather than 15. Do you experience bad > interactivity without seti running? On a related note, when will SCHED_ULE become the default? It looks like it's ready now (I just played Quake 3 while compiling a new X server :)). This should speed up the finding of any bugs in SCHED_ULE. Best regards, Arjan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:29 UTC