Re[2]: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked

From: Max Laier <max_at_love2party.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:20:55 +0100
> I'll admit to being mostly a lurker here, but isn't the point of /sbin
> to be statically linked.  That's what the 's' stands for?

> Second question.  This seems to imply that /sbin and /bin both have to
> have the same behavior?  I have no problem with /bin being dynamically
> linked, but what if I want /bin to be dynamic and /sbin static?

man hier

-- 
Best regards,
 Max                            mailto:max_at_love2party.net
Received on Sun Nov 16 2003 - 06:21:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:29 UTC