On Wednesday 19 November 2003 02:09, Eric Anderson wrote: > Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > >On Tuesday 18 November 2003 18:58, you wrote: > >>On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > >>>On Tuesday 18 November 2003 03:37, you wrote: > >>>>Sorry I wasn't more clear. I need you to print the contents like this: > >>>> print *cpu_cx_count > >>> > >>>cpu_cx_count 1 > >>>cpu_cx_lowest 0 > >>>cpu_idle_hook c0468300 > >>>cpu_cx_next 0 > >>> > >>>I hope these are the correct values. > >> > >>Thanks, those are the correct values for your box. I just posted a patch > >>that should address the boot-time panic. Please revert old patches and > >>try it. > > > >Yep, this looks good. Perhaps you're interested in the following line > > which arose for the first time during boot: > > > >C0? cx_next 0 cx_count 1 > > > >And here is what you requested in your first patch: > > > >cale:~> sysctl hw.acpi.cpu > >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 > >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: 0 > >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_history: 0/0 > > Ok - what do I need to do to try this new acpi stuff out? I'm running > -current as of Nov 14th, and I'd like to help debug/test this on my > notebook.. Try the patch Nate posted in "Updated acpi_cpu patch". For convinience I attached it. That's all I can tell you. -Harry > > Eric
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:29 UTC