Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: >On Tuesday 18 November 2003 18:58, you wrote: > > >>On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: >> >> >>>On Tuesday 18 November 2003 03:37, you wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Sorry I wasn't more clear. I need you to print the contents like this: >>>> print *cpu_cx_count >>>> >>>> >>>cpu_cx_count 1 >>>cpu_cx_lowest 0 >>>cpu_idle_hook c0468300 >>>cpu_cx_next 0 >>> >>>I hope these are the correct values. >>> >>> >>Thanks, those are the correct values for your box. I just posted a patch >>that should address the boot-time panic. Please revert old patches and >>try it. >> >> > >Yep, this looks good. Perhaps you're interested in the following line which >arose for the first time during boot: > >C0? cx_next 0 cx_count 1 > >And here is what you requested in your first patch: > >cale:~> sysctl hw.acpi.cpu >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: 0 >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_history: 0/0 > > Ok - what do I need to do to try this new acpi stuff out? I'm running -current as of Nov 14th, and I'd like to help debug/test this on my notebook.. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology All generalizations are false, including this one. ------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Tue Nov 18 2003 - 16:10:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:29 UTC