On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:26:21PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :Our rationale for encouraging Gordon is as follows: > : > :1. 4.x upgrade path: As we approach 5-STABLE, a lot of users might want > : to upgrade from 4-STABLE. Historically in 4.x, the / partition has > : been very modest in size. One just simply cannot cram the bloat that > : has grown in 5.x into a 4.x partition scheme. Of course there is the > : venerable 'dump - clean install - restore' scheme, but we were looking > : for something a little more user-friendly. > > This argument would apply to very old 4.x users but not to anyone who > installed it as of March 2001. I bumped the nominal size of the > root partition to 128MB in 1.98.2.7 of sysinstall/label.c. Don't you think that people are able to change defaults if they think thats appropriate? > Prior to that Jordan had bumped the root partition size to 100MB > in 1.98.2.3 in March 2001. It was 50MB before then, which is too > small even for 4.x. Hm, then why do I have still room on my 50MB root partition? $ df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/vinum/root 49583 29040 16577 64% / Thats enough for installworld (if softupdates are turned off) GuntherReceived on Wed Nov 19 2003 - 00:47:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:30 UTC