On 25-Nov-2003 Nate Lawson wrote: > > Someone more familiar with ithread_loop should probably answer this. One > workaround might be to enable ACPI_NO_SEMAPHORES on your box. I built and booted a kernel with ACPI_NO_SEMAPHORES, but it still hangs at the same point in the boot. The stack trace is attached. It looks pretty similar to the others. John sc0: <System console> at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x100> vga0: <Generic ISA VGA> at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec acpi_cpu: throttling enabled, 8 steps (100% to 12.5%), currently 100.0% ~Stopped at siointr1+0xec: jmp siointr1+0x220 db> trace siointr1(c298e000,0,c06c9567,6a0,cdb61b58) at siointr1+0xec siointr(c298e000,cdb61bf4,c045a145,c12a0de4,4) at siointr+0x35 intr_execute_handlers(c129f88c,cdb61b70,cdb61bd8,c065c5a3,34) at intr_execute_ha ndlers+0xc8 lapic_handle_intr(34) at lapic_handle_intr+0x3a Xapic_isr1() at Xapic_isr1+0x33 --- interrupt, eip = 0xc0457d70, esp = 0xcdb61bb4, ebp = 0xcdb61bd8 --- AcpiNsGetNextNode(bbc5,cdb61bf4,c044a8b7,c12a0c00,0) at AcpiNsGetNextNode AcpiDsTerminateControlMethod(c12a0c00,c2959700,cdb61c14,c12a0c00,c12a0de4) at Ac piDsTerminateControlMethod+0xed AcpiPsParseAml(c12a0c00,c294fcc0,c2951aa0,ce5b5ac0,d) at AcpiPsParseAml+0x15b AcpiPsxExecute(c2951aa0,0,cdb61c9c,c2951aa0,0) at AcpiPsxExecute+0x202 AcpiNsExecuteControlMethod(c2951aa0,0,cdb61c9c,c0702694,c294dedc) at AcpiNsExecu teControlMethod+0x5f AcpiNsEvaluateByHandle(c2951aa0,0,0,76,c2951aa0) at AcpiNsEvaluateByHandle+0x96 AcpiEvAsynchExecuteGpeMethod(c294dedc,0,c06a6f81,7b,0) at AcpiEvAsynchExecuteGpe Method+0x8c acpi_task_thread(0,cdb61d48,c06b6d35,311,2e636466) at acpi_task_thread+0x105 fork_exit(c0474e20,0,cdb61d48) at fork_exit+0xb4 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8 --- trap 0x1, eip = 0, esp = 0xcdb61d7c, ebp = 0 --- End of MIME messageReceived on Mon Nov 24 2003 - 17:36:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:30 UTC