:I supported the decision because: : :1. It has been requested for years :2. It benefits PAM and NSS. :3. It is easy to revert. Easy to revert? You are talking about depending on mechanisms for authentication and other things that WILL NOT WORK with static binaries as they currently stand and, apparently, will not work in the future either. Easy to revert? I don't think so. More like "Lets do away with support for static binaries entirely". Because that is precisely what is happening here. :Now please move along and revert it on your local system. There are far :too many REAL problems out there that need to be addressed so that 5.2 can :go out the door. This is just wasting time and energy. : :Scott This is a real problem. I have no problem with people who want dynamic roots to get dynamic roots. My problem is with this intention to not fix PAM or NSS in a way that works with static binaries, and my problem is with changing the default from static to dynamic. The result is, down the line, that either (A) it will become impossible to compile anything static, or (B) there will be things you WON'T be able to use NSS for because it will break static binaries. It is a serious logistical and planning mistake, IMHO. -Matt Matthew Dillon <dillon_at_backplane.com>Received on Mon Nov 24 2003 - 18:21:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:30 UTC