On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :I supported the decision because: > : > :1. It has been requested for years > :2. It benefits PAM and NSS. > :3. It is easy to revert. > > Easy to revert? You are talking about depending on mechanisms for > authentication and other things that WILL NOT WORK with static binaries > as they currently stand and, apparently, will not work in the > future either. Easy to revert? I don't think so. > > More like "Lets do away with support for static binaries entirely". > Because that is precisely what is happening here. What the hell are you talking about????Received on Mon Nov 24 2003 - 18:28:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:30 UTC