On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 03:48:57PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > >>... I think [/rescue] only needs to support those > >>recovery actions necessary to repair /bin and /sbin if they break. > > > >My stance is that no failure mode needs to > >be repairable that wasn't repairable with a static /. > > I'm willing to compromise, David. > > Here's what I suggest: > > * I could support removing vi/ex from /rescue. Either way -- keep it or not. But lets agree that the FTP client will be the last thing added to /rescue that is outside the original charter. > * In exchange for this concession, would you be willing > to support adding fetch? If we're going to add an FTP client, lets pick the one with the best functionality for the job -- /usr/bin/ftp. I may not know the complete URL to the bits I need, and if so with fetch you're still screwed. -- -- David (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org)Received on Tue Nov 25 2003 - 18:00:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:31 UTC