On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:07:55PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > What about the newer version of gcc? That is considerably slower than > previous versions, but I don't see people screaming to have it removed. Uh... you must not know what you are talking about. GCC *COMPILES* slower as it does a better job of optimizing (which adds time to the compiling time). The produced optimzied binaries have quicker *RUN-TIME*s. Why would any one want to call for a compiler to be removed that produces faster binaries??Received on Tue Nov 25 2003 - 17:55:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:31 UTC