Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

From: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor_at_gsoft.com.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:07:55 +1030
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 12:20, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>  > OK my bad, it will probably slow down the ports building.
>
> I'll bet a larger percentage of our users build ports than need nss or
> ldap.

Err, yes..
Of course you are claiming it should be either/or, which is not very 
reasonable.

What about the newer version of gcc? That is considerably slower than previous 
versions, but I don't see people screaming to have it removed.

Most things are tradeoffs, this is one of them.

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140  AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5
Received on Mon Nov 24 2003 - 19:38:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:30 UTC