In message <20031128205244.GA40124_at_pmp.uni-hannover.de>, Gerrit =?iso-8859-1?Q? K=FChn?= writes: >On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> >I might have guessed it. >> >Is there anything around FreeBSD you're not working with or on? ;-) > >> sound cards :-) > >Hey, you can quite easily make oscilloscopes from them... :) Not for the speeds I need :-) >> >Perhaps I'll be able to have a look at it next week. Which gpib chipsets >> >does it support (apart from NI, which seems to be some kind of standard)? > >> The idea was to have the generic NI API and per-chip driver code. I > >So you already implemented the complete NI command set?! Not quite but a lot of it yes. The NI command set seems to be simply wrapper functions of the 7210 chip anyway... >Hm, my PCI card (made by INES) uses afaicr a NEC chip, too (can't remember >the number now). Did you ever try to ask Frank Mori Hess or one of the >other guys who are maintaining the Linux gpib driver about datasheets? >Should be strange if no-one has them... I've never spent much time on it, I found some data sheets on some newer chips which were 7210 compatible and went from there. >> Sure it is, but only if there is sufficient hacker momentum will it >> gain the ability and retain the ability. GPIB has been discussed about >> once per year for the last 5 year and we've gotten nowhere further >> for that... > >Ok, I see. Linux seems to have suffered a similar problem for some time. >Actually it's quite a pity - gpib is really useful stuff to have in a lab. >Well, my hacking skills are rather poor and my time is somewhat limited; >otherwise I would already have put more effort into this. And here we go again :-) As much as I'd personally love to have GPIB in FreeBSD, I just don't see it having enough mindshare and marketshare to happen. I'd love to be proven wrong... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Fri Nov 28 2003 - 11:57:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:31 UTC