At 1:32 AM +0100 2003/11/29, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > What exactly would be the point? If this is the OpenBSD fdalloc code, > recent widely-publicized benchmarks have shown it to be inferior to > ours. Perhaps you should concentrate on improving vm_map_find() and > vm_map_findspace() performance instead? Perhaps the implementation on OpenBSD may be worse than ours, but it may add features that help improve our performance further. Certainly, both issues should be checked as broadly as possible. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles_at_skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)Received on Fri Nov 28 2003 - 15:39:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:31 UTC