Re: panic with cdrecord -- anybody else seeing this? [backtrace obtained]

From: John Reynolds <johnjen_at_reynoldsnet.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:10:35 -0700
[ On Wednesday, October 15, Bruce M Simpson wrote: ]
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 05:26:59AM -0700, John Reynolds wrote:
> > Thanks. I haven't tried cdrtools-devel in "a while" so I probably didn't see
> > the work-around that was committed. I will try it and report back as to if it
> > works (to further narrow down the mlockall(2) bit....).
> 
> It looks like alc_at_ has fixed the problem in vm_fault.c rev 1.181.
> 
> BMS

I can definitely confirm this too! With the unpatched cdrecord (in the
non-devel port) and this versio of vm_fault.c there was no panic! Awesome!
Thanks!

-Jr

-- 
John & Jennifer Reynolds  johnjen at reynoldsnet.org        www.reynoldsnet.org
Structural / Physical Design - ICG/PNG SCD     jreynold at sedona.ch.intel.com
Running FreeBSD since 2.1.5-RELEASE.               FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!
"Unix is user friendly, it's just particular about the friends it chooses."
Received on Fri Oct 17 2003 - 20:10:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:25 UTC