I had a fair amount of time over the last week running in disconnected operation, and realized I had too many cables under my desk, so I spent a bit of time exploring the FreeBSD console code. After reading a FREENIX paper this summer on a Linux ethernet console driver, I took a pass at implementing ethernet console support for FreeBSD. This driver is similar to the Linux driver, although not binary-compatible on the wire, as this driver supports both input and output, while the Linux driver supports only output monitoring (and the protocol can't represent bi-directional communication well). There are some potential work-arounds for this, which I'll explore at some point. In general, the wire protocol is probably the weakest part of the endeavor, but I'm having trouble finding documentation for a decent wire console protocol that doesn't come with an entire network stack attached. As with the Linux driver, communication happens at the ethernet link layer, using protocol number 0x0666 (entertaining choice). The contents consist of a little meta-data (not found in Linux), and a nul-terminated string, although the kernel code currently generates only single characters due to the nature of the console code. ethercons implements both a low level putc() console interface, and a high-level pseudo-tty appropriate for /dev/console redirection and getty/login. Unlike the other low-level console drivers, ethercons does not implement low-level input checkc/getc, as ethercons is interrupt driven, and that interface is a polled interface that conflicts with the tty code. I'm considering adopting a timeout-driven model as done in ofw_console, but haven't convinced myself that is entirely desirable. In addition, the ethercons device is not available for I/O when in the debugger context, due to its use of the network stack. To support this, I recently added a flags field to the console definition, and a NODEBUGGER flag. To enable support for ethercons, add "options ETHERCONS" to your kernel configuration. A series of tunables and sysctls is available to tune the behavior of ethercons: kern.ethercons.ifnet_raise "ifconfig up" the interface prior to reaching init so that ethercons may be used in single usermode. Otherwise, ethercons only becomes available when the interface is brought up later by dhclient/ifconfig/... Alternatively, for network booted environments, the interface may already be up. kern.ethercons.interface_preference Interface name preference, if any. Otherwise, the default is the first ethernet interface. The most recently used interface is available read-only via kern.ethercons.interface. kern.ethercons.target Target ethernet address for the console target. Otherwise, the default is ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff. The ethercons client uses bpf; it's a fairly limited tool in its current form. It has several modes of operation: log Follow the console output of all ethernet consoles, logging the output to various log files, named by the source ethernet address of the messages (specified by interface). miniterm A minimalist interactive terminal program to be pointed at a specific ethernet interface and hardware address. send Send a string to a remote console as input (specified by interface, target address). sendcr Send a string to the remote console as input, along with a carriage return (specified by interface, target address). tail Follow the console output of a particular ethernet console (specified by interface and source address). tailall Follow the console output of all ethernet consoles, even though the results are potentially messy (specified by interface). It should be possible to create a more complete client for easier interactive use; alternatively, the firewire console code binds a socket for use with a telnet client, which could be done for ethercons, which might be a better approach than writing more interactive code of that sort. You can set up a getty/login session on /dev/ethercons using /etc/ttys: ethercons "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure The changes consist of three parts: two new kernel files (src/sys/dev/{ethercons.c, ethercons.h}), a kernel patch (ethercons.diff), and a userland tool for monitoring/logging/communicating with the ethernet console (src/usr.sbin/ethercons/{ethercons.c,ethercons.h}). Note that to build the userland ethercons tool, the updated ethernet.h must be in /usr/include/net due to its reliance on the new constant. http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/ethercons-0.2.tgz I believe I have merged all the necessary patches to support ethercons into the base tree, wich the exception of the tweaks to net/ethernet.h to allocate a new ethernet protocol number. I have no immediate plans to commit this code, but would appreciate feedback. It appears to work fairly well for me, but it highlighted some limitations to the FreeBSD networking and console code: (1) Unless you use netgraph, it is "hard" to extended the set of ethernet protocol handlers. Introducing dynamicism in the protocol switches will introduce additional locking costs. (2) Two levels of support are present in the console driver: first, low-level console support provides a simple getc/checkc/putc interface for kernel output and input. However, to support user process interaction with the console, such as syslogd writing to the console, or single-user mode, you need a tty. The two interfaces are fairly incompatible due to the polled vs. interrupt-driven model. To support the polled interface, the console driver needs to own the buffer memory. To support the tty interface, the tty driver needs to own the memory. The open firmware console works around this by having timeouts that transfer data from a console-owned buffer to a tty-owned buffer at intervals. The low-level console code races with the timeout to "get there first" and extract data for the low-level console when it is required. All in all, this puts console/tty driver writers in a sticky situation if the underlying medium doesn't support polled access naturally, and behaves in an interrupt-driven fashion. So, the quick summary: it appears to work, it has limitations, and the wire protocol sucks. I'd like to find a better wire protocol (without too much overhead), and figure out a better answer for low-level console interactions. The client is also pretty limited, and could do with some improvement. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert_at_fledge.watson.org Network Associates LaboratoriesReceived on Mon Oct 20 2003 - 07:14:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:26 UTC