Dan Strick wrote: > There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs > support. If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on > both releases, each claims that the other has left incorrect > summary data in the superblock. Presumably only one can be correct. > I just don't know which to blame. > > I couldn't find a FreeBSD problem report about bad summary data. > I will submit one, but since FreeBSD 4.9 is about to be released, > someone might like to check this out. > > I happen to have multiple FreeBSD operating systems installed on > the same computer. This might also be an issue if you move an > external disk between computers. I don't know if the problem shows > up on all file systems. It seems to happen on all the half dozen > or so of the file systems that my 4.9-RCx and 5.1 systems share. > There is no problem AFAIK, you just have to fsck with the matching executable. A lot has changed with FreeBSD 5, spend some time with the -current archive and you will learn more. I'm sure you noticed how your findings are consistently inconsistent. Pete...Received on Wed Oct 22 2003 - 02:23:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:26 UTC