Re: i386_set_ldt warnings

From: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy_at_siliconlandmark.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:07:41 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Dan Nelson wrote:

> In the last episode (Oct 22), Steve Kargl said:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 12:09:43PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, C. Kukulies wrote:
> > > > Some (kde) applications now have a warning appear in xconsole:
> > > >
> > > > Warning: pid 595 used static ldt allocation.
> > > > See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info
> > >
> > > Let me guess.  You are using Nividia-supplied drivers/libraries?
> >
> > I see similar messages on the console and I do not have a nvidia
> > card.  By the time I find the message the process has terminated, so
> > I have no way of translating the PID into an actual executable name.
>
> That's cause whoever coded the warning forgot to print the executable
> name in the error message.  Try this patch:
>
> Index: sys_machdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/i386/sys_machdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.91
> diff -u -r1.91 sys_machdep.c
> --- sys_machdep.c	7 Sep 2003 05:23:28 -0000	1.91
> +++ sys_machdep.c	22 Oct 2003 16:52:49 -0000
> _at__at_ -464,8 +464,8 _at__at_
>  	if (!(uap->start == LDT_AUTO_ALLOC && uap->num == 1)) {
>  		/* complain a for a while if using old methods */
>  		if (ldt_warnings++ < NUM_LDT_WARNINGS) {
> -			printf("Warning: pid %d used static ldt allocation.\n",
> -			    td->td_proc->p_pid);
> +			printf("Warning: pid %d (%s) used static ldt allocation.\n",
> +			    td->td_proc->p_pid, td->td_proc->p_comm);
>  			printf("See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info\n");
>  		}
>  		/* verify range of descriptors to modify */

This could also be accomplished by enabling process accounting and
grepping the output of lastcomm. But yes, this patch is most welcome
nonetheless. :)

Regards,

> Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant >
> Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/    >
Received on Wed Oct 22 2003 - 11:07:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:26 UTC