Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:13:37PM +0100, John Angelmo wrote: > >>Doug White wrote: >> >> >>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that >>>>this was fixed last night in: >>>> >>>> src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c,v1.8 >>>> src/lib/msun/src/e_scalb.c,v1.10 >>>> >>>>The fix was to use the old versions of isnan() and isinf() >>>>specifically in the two places in libm where they are needed. >>> >>> >>>okay, so the $65,000 question is: >>> >>>Does this make the Diablo JDKs work? :) >>> >> >> >>I could test, should I just get those files from current, integrate with >>5.1-p10 and recompile? > > > That should work. > > Kris I get this: cc -fpic -DPIC -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -D_IEEE_LIBM -D_ARCH_INDIRECT=i387_ -c i387_s_tan.S -o i387_s_tan.So building shared library libm.so.2 e_scalb.So: In function `__ieee754_scalbf': e_scalb.So(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `__ieee754_scalbf' e_scalbf.So(.text+0x0): first defined here *** Error code 1 /JohnReceived on Wed Oct 29 2003 - 13:37:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:27 UTC