Re: __fpclassifyd problem

From: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 14:38:33 -0800
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:

> I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with
> the libm fix from a few days ago).  It does not look good; possibly an
> issue with both the compat libc and native libc being linked in?  Maybe
> libm.so is still bringing in the native libc.so?  We don't install the
> 4.x libm into compat, and I don't have any 4.x machine around to steal it
> from, so I can't test out that theory.

The binary is linked to:

/usr/lib/libm.so.2
/usr/lib/compat/libc.so.4
(and others)

(recall: the source of the libm problems was that libc.so.5 was *not*
linked in).  I'm not sure why gdb says otherwise - perhaps it's
confused about the library paths.

Perhaps there's some kind of ABI problem here that java is choking on.

Kris
Received on Wed Oct 29 2003 - 13:38:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:27 UTC