Doug Barton wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > I attached a verbose dmesg, just in case someone wants to take a look. > > > > | ACPI: DSDT was overridden. > > | -0424: *** Error: UtAllocate: Could not allocate size 50204453 > > | ACPI-0428: *** Error: Could not allocate table memory for [/* > > | R] length 50204453 > > | ACPI-0368: *** Error: Could not copy override ACPI table, AE_NO_MEMORY > > > > I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that perhaps the > > problem is that the damn thing appears to be 50 Megabytes... > > Well, you could have verified that easily enough for yourself by > downloading the file at that URL above. :) And getting 50M, if your dmesg was right... 8-) 8-). > It turns out that it's only 142k, which is another reason I think > that something very odd is happening. My guesses, in order, would be (1) an unitialized variable, or (2) it loads sparsely, or (3) it has a really bogus table entry that claims it needs that much memory. It doesn't look magic enough to be a sign extension/signed-unsigned pun error. Other than starting at the code that's supposed to load the table in, and printf'ing until you find out why it's thinks 50M is a nuce number, I don't know what to tell you... -- TerryReceived on Mon Sep 01 2003 - 12:46:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:21 UTC