In the last episode (Sep 04), Alexander Leidinger said: > At the moment I discussing an issue with Intel regarding 0-sized > arrays. gcc seems to be violating the standard and produces code with > an array size of "0", whereas icc produces code where an 0-sized > array has the size "1". This results in different nm output of > genassym.o: [snip] > - If we depend on it: how hard would it be to rewrite it to not depend > on 0-sized arrays (and does someone volunteer to rewrite it)? It > would be nice if someone could point me to the source if it isn't > an easy task, my contact _at_Intel is willing to convince the > developers to change icc, but he has to "present a persuasive > argument to development to pursue a solution". If you're talking FreeBSD 5, you should be able to simply subsitute a C99 "flexible array member" (basically replace "[0]" with "[]") and get the same effect. 0-length arrays are a gcc extension: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html Under FreeBSD 4.x, you can't use them because gcc 2.95 only supports the gcc extension. Intel has added support for a lot of gcc extensions recently; they may be willing to add this to the list. -- Dan Nelson dnelson_at_allantgroup.comReceived on Thu Sep 04 2003 - 07:29:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:21 UTC