On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Scott M. Likens wrote: > On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 07:44, Paul Richards wrote: > > Overwriting a file that's currently executing results in a "Text file > > busy" error. > > > > When did this start happening? > > > > This was something that was fixed way back on FreeBSD but it seems to be > > a problem again. > > > > Paul. > > this "feature" has always existed in FreeBSD for as long as I remember. > > Of course there are ways to bypass this "feature" but it's there for > your protection. You shouldn't be upgrading a program that's in > resident memory. That's like trying to reinstall X while running in X. > You're just asking for problems. > > turnoff postfix, install the new version and be happy. > > Every single 'flavor' of Unix/Unices has always had this feature. I've > seen it on HP-UX box's on Solaris Servers, Linux, NetBSD, OpenBSD, > FreeBSD. Maybe you wern't paying attention but, that is one of those > things I think should fall under duh, i shouldn't do that it might make > things crash hard. SunOS 4 let you overwrite binaries for running programs, which almost surely made them crash. HP-UX has the annoying misfeature that you cannot even unlink a binary used for paging. The way to do it is to mv/rm te target before installing the new version. AFAIK install(1) will do the right thing. If you are into foot shooting, you can always overwrite a shared lib, such as libc.so, and watch (almost) all your programs crash and burn :-) $.02, /MikkoReceived on Thu Sep 04 2003 - 07:36:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:21 UTC