On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 03:54:36PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Jan Srzednicki wrote: > > First of all, the drive still does not get detected properly. Funny > > thing is that after some playing with atacontrol attach/detach, it > > finally gets detected. And later on, it is normally detected, before. > > Same scenario happened like 3 times with ATAng and newer and newer > > kernels. I don't know whether some device hints or anything are just > > updated; yet, I didn't have _any_ drive detection problems with ATAold. > > > > The problem is with the second drive. There's still some randomness in > > it, as it gets undetected from time to time. > > Try the below patch and let me know if that changes anything.. It seems that things have changed a bit (the drive gets detected more often), but still, it's not perfect. Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's triggered by: cdrecord dev=1,1,0 /some/track greetings, -- -- wrzask --= v =-- Winfried --===-- GG# 3838383 --- -- w_at_dream.vg --- w_at_303.krakow.pl --===-- http://violent.dream.vg/ --- --=< Ride the wild wind - push the envelope, don't sit on the fence, --- -- Ride the wild wind - live life on the razor's edge! >=-- Queen --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:22 UTC