On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:07:15AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > But you seem to thing -pthread == NOOP unbreaks ports ;-) Warner might, but Kris doesn't. Kris is asking for the -pthread option to be restored to let -current users breath easy while the task of updating the ports goes on. Then he's happy for it to become a noop. I susect theat this puts much of the work on a few people rather than many. I hope it doesn't require a volley of emails to each port maintainer to resolve each one. People have jumped off buildings for less than that! -- John BirrellReceived on Sat Sep 20 2003 - 20:13:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:23 UTC