Re: ports and -current

From: M. Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:57:23 -0600 (MDT)
In message: <20030921051525.GA31537_at_freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>
            John Birrell <jb_at_cimlogic.com.au> writes:
: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:07:15AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
: > But you seem to thing -pthread == NOOP unbreaks ports ;-)
: 
: Warner might

It appreas to unbreak one port: icecast.  It was the first port I
found so I assumed many ports were that way, but I couldn't find any
others having gone and looked at the breakage right now.

: but Kris doesn't. Kris is asking for the -pthread option
: to be restored to let -current users breath easy while the task of updating
: the ports goes on. Then he's happy for it to become a noop.

I'd be cool with this.  I don't think the 'unfreeze the ports' option
is a viable one, which leaves us with this.

Warner
Received on Sat Sep 20 2003 - 20:57:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:23 UTC